Muse back!

February 06, 2006 / Monday

Some Words Should Not Be Abbreviated

I just finished reading a chapter on design and code reviews for class tomorrow. In that chapter was a little section on defect injection and removal. In that little section was a table. In that table were column headers that read "Cum Injected" and "Cum Removed".

How did that get past the editors?

It reminded me of a user on a past project who wanted me to generate a table with a column titled "Cum Yield". After several double takes at his e-mail, I realized he was talking about cumulative yield, and had quite innocently suggested "Cum Yield" to save real estate. I made sure to leave enough room for several full spellings of "cumulative" in the header.

I suppose I could have titled the column as requested, but I wouldn't have been able to talk about the app (or to that user, for that matter) with a straight face after that.

February 6, 2006 11:38 PM |

Comments

um, yeah, good job changing the header! but i can't believe the same kinda thing made it into a serious book. good grief.

Posted by: heather at February 7, 2006 07:38 AM

Reminds me of my Chinese statistics prof who had no idea why people were laughing when he asked over and over, "If I flip a coin, what are the chances that I will get head and what are the chances that I will get tail?" Homo or hetero, I say 50%.

Posted by: url54 at February 7, 2006 11:30 AM

At a company I used to work for, the code had a variable that was supposed to count the number of buttons on a page. The variable name: "NumButts". That one had me giggling for a long time.

Posted by: Rat at February 7, 2006 02:49 PM

reminds me of when Alan Cumming was on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart (mmmmmmmmm, smexxxah!) and he said he was coming out with a fragrance called, quite simply, "Cumming". nice.

Posted by: cheddah j at February 7, 2006 03:07 PM

I was looking over some electrical drawings the other day, and saw several instances of "Anal In", "Anal Out" and some other anal references. Apparently analog inputs/outputs needed to be funnier.

Posted by: Mike at February 7, 2006 05:52 PM

oh lordy lordy i'm laughing my ass off -- UNBELIEVABLE!! yeah, how DID that get past the frickin editors??? esheesh..

but i have to say, scrolling through the previous commenters, i cracked up AGAIN at "url54"'s story about his Chinese stats prof's question.

wow, two funnies in a row!

viv your blog ROCKS SO HARD

Posted by: amy at February 8, 2006 01:55 PM


A conference brochure I got recently had a good one: PMS. There was "About PMS", the "6th Annual PMS conference" and, my favorite, "The History of PMS." Uhm, editor, anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous at February 9, 2006 11:02 AM

reminds me of when Alan Cumming was on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart (mmmmmmmmm, smexxxah!) and he said he was coming out with a fragrance called, quite simply, "Cumming"

That wasn't a joke - you really can buy this stuff: http://www.cummingthefragrance.com

The commercial is either hilarious or disturbing. Not sure which.

Posted by: Anonymous at February 9, 2006 08:51 PM

Oh.
Mah.
Gah.

Posted by: pat at February 14, 2006 09:19 PM